Janoshik says the sample believed to be 5-Amino-1MQ was tested using two different fentanyl immunoassays, with each test run twice. Even after dilution, all four tests reportedly came back positive.
Does this increase your confidence in the findings, or do you think confirmatory testing (such as LC-MS/MS) is still necessary before drawing conclusions?
I spent years afraid of gaining fat once I got over that building muscle became a lot easier
Been trying to gain without feeling sluggish so far it’s going better than expected
Every pound feels like a victory when you’ve always been the skinny guy
I looked into MOTS-C mostly because recovery has been getting slower as I’ve gotten older. Didn’t expect miracles, but I was curious if it’d help with energy more than anything.
Bro I honestly felt more consistent in the gym. Not stronger overnight, just less of those days where I felt completely drained walking in.
I kept seeing people lump it together with other mitochondrial peptides and figured I’d read up on it. Still haven’t decided if it’s worth trying.
My expectations were probably too high. I thought cardio would suddenly become easy. Reality was… not really. Maybe a slight bump in endurance, maybe placebo.
I mainly wanted to see if it helped with fatigue while cutting. That’s always the hardest part for me.
I chased every “next big peptide” for a while. Eventually realized training consistency was doing 95% of the work. Now I’m a lot more skeptical before spending money.
The interest came from longevity podcasts more than bodybuilding forums if I’m being honest.
I actually stopped after a few weeks because I couldn’t confidently say anything was changing.
For me the attraction wasn’t muscle gain. It was metabolic health. Different goal entirely.
That’s what I’d want to see too. Subjective feelings are nice, but labs tell a better story.
My coach basically said don’t expect MOTS-C to replace conditioning. If your cardio sucks, you still have to do cardio.
